Category Archives: Jacqui Smith

White Supremacists In Terror Plot

White Supremacists: Most likely only a danger to themselves.

Man and teenage son held after ricin found – Times Online

A teenage boy and his father are being held under the Terrorism Act over a suspected Ricin poison plot by white supremacists.

Question is, how on earth did the police know that it was ricin in the jam jar without opening it? Personally if I am unsure what is in a jar, I open it and sniff.


Whilst I understand the seriousness of this case, I do think that the police may be building up their part just a tad.

Senior police say they believe the two could be part of worldwide terror plot targeting ethnic minorities.

Something tell me that the term World Wide may be a little bit of an exaggeration, what with whites themselves being ethnic minorities everywhere outside of Europe and North America.

International perhaps, but World Wide? I don’t think so.

That isn’t the end of the justification round however:

Durham’s assistant chief constable Mike Barton said: “This shows that the terrorist threat in the UK is real and present.’

Well, that makes all these years of anti-terror laws, after anti-terror laws, the evaporation of our civil liberties, the further encroachment of the police and state into our daily lives, the extensive databases of DNA and personal information, all worth it.

None of them were used in this investigation, the ricin was discovered by accident and the ‘real and present’ threat that it posed had been languishing in a kitchen cupboard for two years.

stroke of luck

The fact is the police tripped over this ‘terror plot’ and couldn’t believe their luck. A pair of idiots had created ricin (no easy feat), perhaps plotting the rise of the white race over a pint or two, or in an armchair but just never figured out how to deliver, or, more likely, that they wanted to.

The pair of idiots are probably even now kicking themselves for not having gotten rid of it. Idiots they may be, but the best quote of this investigation again come from Mike Barton:

“White supremacists seem to hate an awful lot of people.”

Ethnic minorities, as the name suggests, are a minority of people, so it would be fair to say that the supremacists hate a lot less people than say, radical Muslims or the likes of Harriet Harman, Jacky Smith and Caroline Flint, who hate all men.

He added: “This will spawn an awful lot of intelligence which will then kick start other criminal counter terrorism inquiries elsewhere.”

Again demonstrating that the Police cannot believe their luck with having this fall into their lap!

As for the ricin itself, it is 6,000 times more powerful than cynaide, just an amount the size of a grain of salt is enough to kill an adult. A most potent and lethal substance.

“It was in a sealed jam jar that has been kept in a kitchen cupboard – apparently for up to two years.”

How are they still alive? What a bunch of half-wits!

Wacky Jacky’s spouse whacks off at taxpayers expense

Mr Timney: Hen pecked

Jacqui Smith’s husband stops short of apology to public over porn expenses claim – Times Online

Jacqui Smith’s husband apologised to the Home Secretary on the doorstep of the family’s home today after claiming for two pornographic movies on her MP’s expenses allowance – but stopped short of saying sorry to the taxpayer.

This has to be the funniest story I have read in a while, all the more amusing that it is staunch feminist Jacky Smith’s husband! She naturally claimed that she wasn’t there, but you have to wonder. I have known a few feminists who were more than a little relaxed in their views in the bedroom.

Mrs Timney

That said Jacky Smith doesn’t really strike me as that sort of person. Indeed I (thankfully!) cannot imagine her engaging in sex with a man at all. I wouldn’t be surprised if her kids were conceived through artificial insemination as she probably views sex with a man as some kind of submission to male dominance.

Married to Jacky, it is no wonder Mr Timney has a penchant for pornography, although – and I could be wrong, I always thought that pornography on cable was soft porn? If so, then it isn’t really porn at all and not really anything worse than can be seen late nights on Channel Five (if they still show those sorts of movies).

Anyway, although I should be mad with Mr Timney, being married to Mrs Timney actually makes me feel sorry for him, in a similar way that viewers felt sorry for Richard being married to Mrs Bucket in Keeping Up Appearances. The poor man must be completely emasculated living with her.

Jacky prepares her husband for work

Not only is Mr Timney a stay at home dad, or house husband, but his wife calls herself Miss Smith, rather than Mrs Timney, just to make him feel even more like the mistress, or the hired help. Jacky also claims to be an ordinary mum of two in an attempt to capture the mum vote, but there is nothing ordinary about her arrangement. She is rarely home and it was her husband that did all of the mother jobs, such as changing nappies and taking the children to and from school.

No wonder he wanted a little late night entertainment, but he is most likely regretting it now. 

Ocean’s 13

I am sure that after the whole ‘You’ve ruined my career!’ speech he also got the ‘Women are not sex objects,’ speech. Poor Mr Timney. But this of course begs the question, why didn’t Jacky see the movies on the bill? Surely underneath the film Oceans 13 she noticed Dirty and Kinky Mature Women and Naughty Amateur Night (or whatever he watched)? Does she not check the bills, especially before she submits them to be claimed back as expenses?

You’d think that with her being the main breadwinner she’d take more of an interest in the finances. Then again perhaps she did know about the films, perhaps it was Mr Timney who was absent at the time the movies were viewed and it was Jacky getting her kicks in the second home.

Whatever the reason, it is not really such a big deal paying for masturbation material for the Timney’s, after all, we pay for everything else. Despite being a house husband and therefore unable to work in any other kind of job, Mr Timney gets paid £40,000 a year to be his wife’s advisor, which apparently doesn’t intrude on his main role in the home.

Still, even though between them the pair earn nearly a quarter of a million a year they still can’t afford furniture, and the taxpayer has had to buy them a new dinning table, a washing machine, a home entertainment centre, a tumble dryer, an antique fireplace, coal to burn in it, another washing machine (perhaps the first one didn’t match the dryer?), a cooker, a sofa bed and yes, even a kitchen sink.

This is what I just don’t understand about the expenses system, surely an expense is a cost that is incurred whilst doing their job, e.g. paper for replying to constituent letters, fuel costs for travelling to and from Parliament; I really don’t understand how a kitchen table is an expense of her job? A sink? She needs the sink to do her job? It is ridiculous and immoral. The expense system has become free money, a way to claim for anything and everything with little or no scrutiny or evaluation.

It should be scrapped immediately and replaced with the same system that other businesses use, everything has to be run by the boss before being approved, i.e. us. If they don’t like it, they can find another job.